Submitted by: Unknown
-
-
Copy & paste this:
« Previous Only the Greatest Show I Forgot All About | An Unbalanced Meal Next »
Sometimes It Means Try Harder
» Awwwww Yeeeeah 80 Comments
Leave a Reply
-
Trolls Trolling
AlonzoDaCookie on At Least It Wasn’t Jenna… rntwhyh on Annie are You Okay? AlonzoDaCookie on Want to See the Mouse I C… lizardcomment on Arcade Flip KYAD on Hey, You’re Learnin… Clint (@newfiebangaa… on It Was in the Name of Saf… Derp on Hey, You’re Learnin… MrWeapons on It Was in the Name of Saf… Takumi Fujiwara on At Least It Wasn’t Jenna… Terra (Uber Nerd) on Compare It to Your Grandm…
sometimes it means nothing
Why do you guys keep stealing those ragecomics from reddit?! -.-
Man up and make your own comics.
Woman up and keep stealing them.
It’s reddit. Who cares.
Was it really necessary to censor “r**e”? I think it only makes it less clear.
I have no idea what it is about now ^_^’
Wait I think I figured it out, nevermind
It’s rice
well then that’s good, I did start saying no to “rice” after I went on a low-carb diet, I’ve already lost 8kgs
Nobody cares, man
I care, actually.
I also care.
indeed.. and are we going to censor all the words someone could find offensive ?
you ARE offended you don’t GET offended.
as in you get annoyed by someone but someone cannot be annoying..
(you can offend and annoy on purpose but that’s not the point here)
In all fairness they didn’t censor “r**e”, they censored “”.
Yeah they’re going overboard with the censoring. I mean, we know what it means, so what is the point of obscuring it?
Yeah, taht’s why I opened the comments. It’s retarded, censoring “f**k” would be dumb, but r***… (And no butt r***, you sick bastards)
I am offended by the letters “FUUUU” and demand to have the FUUU-face replaced by a face shouting “**************************”
LMAO at the title, well done mods. It’s especially funny in the context of the r(asterisk)(asterisk)e, try harder when they say no
Since when did become a swear?
wow, you managed to the noun
I don’t think there’s anything at all wrong with rage.
Rake?
Nothing wrong with rakes, they can be quite useful.
Rice?
Race?
Rage?
Rope?
Rose?
Role?
There’s nothing wrong about rope! How would you tie girls up without one?
The rope is made from hemp, so the DEA censored it.
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEPOST
I had this one teacher who made r**e jokes…
Why can’t you type “r**e” but we have pedobear?
If men can’t even see the word, how will they be able to see themselves doing it? R**e isn’t always what you see on SVU. Usually women never confront their rapist and if that doesn’t happen a man might not ever be aware that he r**ed a woman.
This scenario deserves a scumbag steve hat.
How can a person be unaware of r*ping someone? If provided she is conscious and didn’t say no, stop, get off me, or any other variation on that theme and didn’t struggle to get away it’s not r**e. Then it’s just buyers remorse. There are enough problems with proving actual r**e that we don’t need the ‘sex wasn’t good enough so I’ll call it r**e’ or “I wish I hadn’t slept with him it must be r**e’ stuff adding to the confusion.
Except that’s wrong. Lack of consent = r**e, not saying no.
So that’s why people can be unaware of it.
Actually, when surveyed, some people will say they have never r*ped someone but when the survey discusses the situation of r**e without the actual word, they will say they’ve done it.
If the woman doesn’t say no, try to get away, or fight it is consensual. You sound like one of those people who confuse themselves with feminists who claim that sex without a written contract signed in advance is r**e. Stop trying to justify buyers remorse type false accusations.
That’s like telling someone who was robbed at knifepoint “Well, you didn’t fight him or try to get away so I guess you wanted to be mugged”. Has it ever crossed your mind that in some situations victims are too terrified to do any of those things you suggested? That all they care about is survival and that perhaps the only way of getting through that experience is to just shut up and do what the offender wants?
R**e is not a cut-and-dry, black-and-white situation so don’t think you can determine in one paragraph what it is and isn’t.
Those two situations have nothing in common other than that they are crimes. That comparison is like saying apples and oranges taste the same because they are both spheres and both fruit. As a matter of fact summing it up in one paragraph is exactly what the law does.
So, to you, if a man walks up to a woman, sticks his dick in her (or even just his finger!), and walks away before she has a chance to fight or run, that’s not r**e.
Yes because in a vain effort to disprove me you pull out an extremely unlikely set of circumstances. Frankly I would love to see how that could be possible.
It doesn’t matter how improbable it is. I want to know if that happened, would you consider it r**e? Because your definition says that it is not.
No that is an invalid question. It has about as much logic as the whole if you could only save one child shtick. No sane person would ever be able to choose one child over the other, if that were a real life situation, or they would die trying to save both. It is not logical nor a valid mental exercise. Your question which any sane person can see has no validity, because it is so unlikely to occur that it may as well be impossible. So no I will not answer a invalid question.
Yeah, dude, I don’t care how unlikely it is to happen. If it ever did, because technically, it could, you say it would not be r**e. Hopefully you will one day wake up and realize how f**ked up that thinking is.
Yeah keep that comfortable blanket of lies and self delusion to wrap yourself up in at night.
Lies and self-delusion? So you WOULDN’T consider it r**e?
@LPC
The lies and self delusion to which I referred were you trying to put words in my mouth. Which you keep trying to do in some vain effort to appear intelligent.
I did try to ask you, but you would not answer me. If you want to tell me that what I think you would say is wrong, you may do so. Don’t complain because you aren’t answering.
@LPC
I’m not complaining I’m just disappointed in anyone who is unable to apply logic. You want to turn facts into some weird muddy emotional turmoil. I’m sorry you spend so much time trying to avoid reality but it really isn’t my problem.
R**e doesn’t mean just saying no. If the woman says nothing, it’s r**e. If the man keeps pushing and she finally gives in, that’s r**e. If the woman is drunk and the man is sober, even that is legally considered r**e.
yeah you must be popular with the lads. I’m sure you try to get every male who asks you out on the registered offender list.
Seriously so every husband who pesters his wife to give him a little is a r**ist? You have some serious issues.
There is a line. There is a little harmless pestering which ceases when it becomes apparent your partner really is NOT interested, and there is nonstop pestering, threatening, pleading, etc.
Your talking about harassment which is a different thing altogether.
I agree. Since the sexual act itself was consensual, but the ways in which the consent was reached were unnecessarily pushy, I would go with sexual harassment.
That’s bulls*** and you know it. If a guy gets drunk and does *anything* it’s their fault. Whether it be driving drunk, robbery, murder, jaywalking, vandalism, arson, sleeping with a fat chick, eating at waffle house, purchasing a Justin Bieber album, or any other poor choice… it’s the guys fault.
But if a woman gets drunk and sleeps with a guy she wouldn’t if she were sober all of the sudden it’s .
If you can’t drink in moderation, you know… not get wasted or not give a damn about what bad choices you make then maybe you shouldn’t drink.
Certain women want equal rights and special treatment… it makes no sense to me. Why can’t you just own up to your mistakes like the rest of us.
And also just want equal rights, because that’s how it should be for everyone… in America at least. Not sure how other cultures view that so I can’t exactly speak for them.
tl;dr
You’re an idiot who likes double standards.
That’s not a double standard. A double standard would be saying “If a sober man sleeps with a drunk woman, it’s r**e. If a sober woman sleeps with a drunk man, it’s his fault for being drunk.” I don’t see that message.
The double standard part was that if a man is sober but a woman is drunk and she later regrets sleeping with the man it’s r**e. However, if it’s the other way around it’s just a man making a bad decision and it’s his fault for getting so drunk he can’t control himself.
I call that a double standard. Then again I’m sure I don’t share your vast knowledge of everything.
But Bobbles didn’t say that. In fact, no one brought up men being r**ed. You brought up completely different crimes. You may have a point, but comparing r**e to robbery isn’t the way to get it across.
And there is simply no need to be snarky. I never said I knew everything. I never even got close. Unnecessary hostility.
It’s not the presence of a “no” that determines it, it’s the absence of a clear “yes”.
BIG difference.
So every time two drunk people get it on without talking it must mean they r*ped each other? Yeah the difference is one is realistic and the other isn’t. If she participates without duress that is implied consent.
In any case, it is ridiculous to have a policy of “implied consent.” That means everyone is willing to have sex with you unless they say otherwise. Which is false. Most people don’t want to have sex with most other people. That is why one is supposed to assume no consent if nothing is said.
If she actively participates without a threat or drugging(Rohypnol and the like) then yes that would be implied consent whether or not there was a discussion before hand.
My point is that implied consent is bulls**t. Assuming someone is willing to have sex with you is wistful thinking. And it’s thinking like that that gets men in to trouble.
No the point is implied consent will help keep false accusations from going to court. R@pe is a very real crime and ‘buyers remorse’ cases make it that much more difficult for true victims to get justice.
How on earth will it do that? There is a HUGE difference between “I’m going to accuse this guy of r**e because I regret having sex with him” and “I’m going to accuse this guy of r**e because he decided to have sex with me without asking.”
Implied consent, like any other action in which two parties are not communicating, is dangerous. What the person starting the sexual interaction could consider an innocent act may be r**e in the eyes of the person receiving it. And that creates a case that is “buyer’s remorse” on one side, but the other legitimately sees it as r**e.
You probably mean “…women never confront their r****t…”
^ The comment above is absolutely correct. I mean, what’s the point of censoring “the R word” if we have mascots representing even the various aspects of it? It’s not America here, people, it’s Internet. Start using your brains please
Offended by words? Congratulations, you are a whiny moron.
Rome?
This made me lol out loud in history class.
I enjoyed history before it was history.
* 5hrs later * OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHH
R**E !!! ^^
Where’s the true story pic because this happened to several guys I knew and myself at college after a speaker in CEP/chapel/whatever they were calling it then.
I found it offensive that I had to be told that r**e is wrong.
…You know there does exist a premade female rage girl face right??? You didn’t need the extra effort of putting in the rage guy face then adding her hair…
FWIW, I think the issue is allowing it to get through workplace spam filters. Certain words, such as pe**s, etc, will automatically flag an email to a spam filter.
But I could be wrong.
If “no” means “no” does that mean that “no no” means “yes” because it’s a double negative?
She wanted to GO OUT with you. So she had to make that sign here story to make sure you werent a r**er. OBVIOUSLY
ummm….. do you possibly mean r**ist? God, what a dum**ss
won’t stop posting, mods, u jelly?
So it’s okay to make fun of Christians and draw penises, but God forbid someone says r**e.
It’s my name. I think.
why cencore it i think its kinda stupid to censer it keeps 9 year old girls off the website by the way ALLAH UOH ACKHBAR OOLOOLOOLOOLOOLOOLOOLOO
___________________________________________________________
bet ya didnt see my name
I love the mods. There, i said it